Evidence Classic · Emergency and public health · Issue 00
Salt, sugar and a monsoon
In a refugee camp, a physician ran short of intravenous fluid. What his team measured next changed the treatment of diarrhoea everywhere.
Bongaon, West Bengal, India, 1971 · published 1973
During the 1971 war that led to the independence of Bangladesh, millions of people fled into India, and cholera followed them. At a treatment centre in the border town of Bongaon, Dilip Mahalanabis of the Johns Hopkins centre in Calcutta had far more patients than intravenous fluid.
Oral rehydration, a solution of salt and glucose in water, had worked in controlled research wards. It was not trusted outside them. With supplies running out, his team made it in bulk and gave it by mouth, with relatives helping patients drink.
They wrote down what happened. Of 3,703 patients treated at the centre, 3.6% died. In a demonstration unit that relied on oral fluid, the figure was 1% among 1,190 patients, in the conditions of a crowded emergency camp.
Because the results were recorded and published, they could not be dismissed as anecdote. Oral rehydration became standard treatment worldwide, and in 1978 The Lancet described it as potentially the most important medical advance of the century.
Evidence gathered in a crisis still counts, if someone writes it down.
Evidence Passport
- What changed
- An oral glucose-salt solution used as the main treatment for cholera when intravenous fluid was scarce.
- What was measured
- Deaths among patients treated at the Bongaon centre.
- Result
- 3.6% of 3,703 patients overall; 1% of 1,190 patients in the oral-therapy demonstration unit.
- Limits
- An emergency field report, not a randomised trial. Patients in different units may not have been comparable.
Sources
- Mahalanabis D, et al. Oral fluid therapy of cholera among Bangladesh refugees. Johns Hopkins Med J 1973
- 50 years of oral rehydration therapy: the solution is still simple. The Lancet 2018
An editorial feature about published work. The people named did not apply to Evinca, were not reviewed by us, and are not Evinca honorees.